Analysis · February 2026
Share:𝕏fin

A Decade of Disaster: How Emergency Programs Took Over Farm Subsidies

In less than a decade, emergency and disaster programs went from a supplemental safety net to the dominant form of federal agricultural spending — accounting for $64.67B of the total.

💡 Key Insight

Average annual spending jumped from $10.79B (2017–2018) to $15.33B (2019–2025) — a 1.4× increase. The peak year was 2020 at $38.73B.

The Before and After

In 2017, total USDA farm subsidy spending stood at $6.35B. By 2020, it had exploded to $38.73B — a 6.1× increase in just three years. The culprit? A cascade of crises: trade wars in 2018–2019, the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, and ongoing climate disasters that triggered billions in emergency relief.

Emergency Spending by the Numbers

Our analysis identified 39 emergency and disaster programs that collectively paid out $64.67B — that's 44% of all farm subsidies in the dataset. The largest include:

ProgramAmount
CFAP Round 2$14.23B
Emergency Commodity Assistance Program$9.36B
Emergency Relief Program$6.56B
CFAP CARES Act$5.60B
Supp Disaster Relief (Non-Specialty Crops)$5.40B
CFAP CCC Payments (A)$5.15B
CFAP3 Top-Up Payments$4.35B
Whip Plus 3 Assistance$2.49B
Emerg Assist Livestock Bees Fish (Elap)$1.81B
Emrgncy Relief Program Trk 1-Nonspclty Crps$1.38B

The New Normal?

The shift to emergency spending raises fundamental questions about U.S. farm policy. Traditional programs like CRP and Price Loss Coverage were designed for predictable support. But when emergencies become the norm — trade wars, pandemics, climate disasters — the "emergency" label starts to feel permanent.

Even in the more recent years of 2023–2024, spending remains elevated well above the 2017 baseline, suggesting the era of emergency-dominated farm spending is far from over.

Explore our disaster spending analysis for program-level details, or see spending trends over time.

Related Analysis

View all 27 analysis articles →